Thu 5 Apr 2007
I receive a reply from Sitemeter!
Further to my email of two days ago, I was delighted to note a response in my email inbox. Mainly as I was hoping this would be the first step in making cold hard cash out of you lot.
Alas, the response read thusly…
From: “webmaster”
Sent: 03 April 2007 18:19
To: “Mister Angry”
Subject: Re: Commercial enquiryHello,
Thanks for your email.
The cookie you are seeing is from a trusted partner who we are working with to provide more intelligence to you about your visitors. In the past few days we’ve begun beta testing this cookie.
Over the next few months we will be rolling out enhancements to our service that will offer you more information about your users like their other content interests and demographics (a la Quantcast). In addition this cookie will allow us to offer other new useful features in the future, including tracking Unique Visitors, Heat Mapping etc.
We believe that this new information along with our current services we already provide will be of great benefit to our users. Keep watching our page for announcements regarding these upgrades and changes. We would also ask that you use discretion in sharing this information. We are trying not to show our hand to our competitors.
If you would rather not participate in this process we can offer you a couple options -
1 - If you replace your current Java code with the standard HTML Sitemeter code the cookie will no longer be issued.
2 - We can move you to a new server that will be restricted from the cookie process.If you would like to move to the restricted server please let us know and we will create a new FREE upgraded account for you. We won’t be able to transfer any historical data, but you will still be able to log into your old account and view your old account stats.
Thanks,
The Sitemeter Team
No mention of the Commercial proposal I submitted to them! But the deal is not dead, far from it. At no point in that email did they say No! In my line of work this is almost a Yes!
So, I have decided to continue the dialogue.
Dear Webmaster,
Thank you very much for your email response. With Technorati suggesting that several thousand people are writing about you at the moment, I was delighted to see that you had taken the time to respond to my note. Even if you did not seem to be able to respond to me by my name. It is Mr. Angry for future reference, or Angry, or even Mr. A. I am not precious about it (but note how I call you by your name, Webmaster)
I am also glad that you were able to outline the reasons for introducing your new biscuit, though I have to admit that as the words flew passed me I managed to catch about as much as an England cricketer.
Do not worry however, I am not a geek who is interested in Quantcast or Heat mapping (or any other weapons of mass destruction). I am a business man. Which is why I was somewhat disappointed that you seem to have ignored my commercial proposal about sharing the revenue you are making from the new Sitemeter biscuits that are forced upon my unsuspecting visitors. However, I did notice that you did not say No!
I can only assume that this is a negotiating ploy, and this was merely a holding email whilst my proposal is discussed in the highest echelons of Sitemeter Towers. I am sure you will ultimately see that this revenue sharing opportunity will maximise the commercial benefits for us both. After all, the Internet was designed to exploit people who are bored at work, so we are merely continuing the work of our web-based forefathers, Tim Berners-Lee, Brent Hoberman and Perez Hilton.
I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience to discuss the contractual arrangements. I would be happy to have my legal counsel draw up the contracts if you would prefer?
Kind regards,
Mr. Angry
—————————————————————————————————————-
UPDATE : As reminded in the comments by Katy, there is a little bit of bonus Mr Angry action over at This is This today. One day only, get it whilst it’s hot.
27 Responses to “Sitemeter saga: Part Deux”










April 5th, 2007 at 8:59 am
Google specificclick, quite a lot of trouble over it apparently. google is the way to go.
April 5th, 2007 at 9:17 am
Too much to read.
Are their any other female readers want to share details on the quality of their baps?
April 5th, 2007 at 10:49 am
Oli - I should be pleased for the reply then…
EP - It is not that sort of website. For that sort of talk you need to go to my other website.
April 5th, 2007 at 10:52 am
EP - you beat me to it!
Maybe a combination of easter bunny girls and baps? Just and idea.
The Doctor.
April 5th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Does anyone know where I can get a cheap bunny girl outfit from?
Cheap as in inexpensive, obviously I am aiming to be a high class type bunny girl.
April 5th, 2007 at 11:25 am
And of course it is left to me to point out to your readers that there is a special bonus Angry appearance at This Is This today.
*sigh*
I have to do everything round here.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:06 pm
Doc - Take a cold shower, and repeat as necessary.
Betty - Thank you. That is going to help enormously.
Katy - Oops! Yes I had forgotten! Everyone, go and read that thing that Katy linked to. It is not entirely shit.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
It is pretty good, actually. I am delighted to say that Angry falls under my uber-man-bagsy. This means that anyone who wants to date him will have to present a pretty impressive business case to me first. You are all on notice.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
I would like to be the first to categorically state that I do NOT want to date Angry.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:34 pm
Katy - I can still have sex with other people, right? Hypothetically speaking?
EP - Me doth think you protest too much…
April 5th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Afraid not Angry, your under her heel now.
You also have to turn jewish, no more christmas for you.
April 5th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
I have bagsied all the fit women in the world.
Angry, I suppose you are free to have sex with all the others, who are not bagsied.
April 5th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Oh, and shotgun!
April 5th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
Trust me, on that subject there is no protest level that is too much.
My interest in Fabulous Knockers is more than enough evidence of my orientation.
And I’m not talking man boobs!
April 5th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Angry, darling, of course you can have sex with other women provided I have authorised them to engage in sexual congress with you.
One is not unreasonable.
April 5th, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Mind you, I’m hoping that I fall under Betty’s counter-bagsy, in which case I am assuming that she will have to deal with a lot of carefully thought out business cases. Right? Right, Betty?
… right?
April 5th, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Oli - I have dropped the Jewish thing. It makes things far too complicated.
April 5th, 2007 at 4:05 pm
Betty, there’s a sexy bunny costume front and center on one of my favorite websites to get cheap costumes: http://www.3wishes.com/
Oh, and by cheap, I mean slutty.
And Katy, I don’t think it’s a Jewish bunny costume, so any of those women who could potentially engage in sexual congress with Mr. Angry should be able to pull this one off.
April 5th, 2007 at 4:16 pm
There is an “I Dream of Jeanie” outfit!!!!
All my dreams have come true.
April 5th, 2007 at 4:26 pm
What the fuck has happened to this site in the last 48 hours?
My Google referrals may never recover…
April 5th, 2007 at 4:30 pm
Betty started it.
April 5th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
and she should be rightly thanked
April 5th, 2007 at 7:58 pm
Is calling shotgun another type of bagsy?
April 6th, 2007 at 1:19 am
Ok, I know I’m later than usual but have I come to the wrong blog or are you all high as the proverbial?
(And if so, why was I not invited!? I have fabulous boobs too!)
April 9th, 2007 at 9:09 pm
has Equine Pimp got a crush on you or some’at?
April 10th, 2007 at 10:47 am
No
April 11th, 2007 at 12:39 am
wooo hooo… a negotiation process via email with motorized monkey meat calling themselves a corporation.
where did you develop your language/ communication skills? i am particularly jealous of your vocabulary, and straight forward no nonsense approach.
brilliant.