Tue 3 Apr 2007
The Internet has always been a place for anonymity. A place where no-one knew who you were, where you came from, or where you were going. Those of you who choose to read this in the nude after Googling “How can I make my vacuum cleaner ‘love’ me?” would prefer that people did not know things like this. Do not worry Fat Jim, I will not tell anyone.
Then someone invented cookies. These are not biscuits (I did not think that, and anyone who says I did is lying), but tiny little files that websites put on your computer to find out stuff about you. Many are harmless, such as the ones websites like this use, to see how many people have come to visit. I used them because I like looking at the graphs. It makes me feel popular in the absence of real fan mail (this is what we in the trade call a ‘hint’).
Unfortunately, my site statistics counter of choice (Sitemeter) have recently started adding tracking cookies to their code, so when you visited here and were logged as a visitor (and added to my pretty charts), they were also putting some cookies on your computer to help people advertise to you. I did not know about this (if you want a better description of what they are doing - I do not do ‘technical’, then read this).
This is frankly not on. If anyone is going to be exploiting and making money out of my readers then it bloody well better be me. I did not receive an email from Sitemeter offering me a cut of the proceeds, and so I have removed them, and their pretty charts, from this website.
Angry I may be, but I am not unreasonable, particularly when there is money to be made, so I have offered them an olive branch.
Dear Sitemeter,
Hello from the Internet! I am sure you know me. I am one of your recently unsubscribed customers.
I, like many others, have chosen to stop using your service since your deal with specificclick.net and the tracking cookies you have been installing on my website visitors’ computers.
Let me be clear about this, if there is money to be made from the shite that I write on a daily basis, then I want in.
I think that in the circumstances a 50/50 split would not be unreasonable. I know for a fact that some of my readers have money (at least one of them drives a cabriolet and another one has two houses), so I’m sure you and your advertising cohorts would like to get their grubby little hands on them (or their computers - I do not think you are into that kind of thing yet).
Well, now you can. At a price. And that price is 50% of whatever you are making from them (for clarification).
I look forward to hearing from you with details of my cut, at which point I will reinstall your tracking code.
Kind regards,
Mr Angry.
I will let you all know if they get back to me. Maybe.
29 Responses to “We are watching you”










April 3rd, 2007 at 8:13 am
so as your readers I think we should get a cout of the 50%
April 3rd, 2007 at 8:14 am
Bloody typo’s - should read… a CUT of the 50%……
*colleague hands AFC 30K first cup of coffe of the day so normal service will be resumed shortly*
April 3rd, 2007 at 8:18 am
Go Angry!
Oh, and a modest payment will be all that’s necessary here. We’re not greedy
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:01 am
Mr Angry, Consumer Warrior.
Unfortunately not Mr. Angry, Web Guru, cos you’ve got your link to Troubled Diva wrong.
GH
PS I don’t do “fan mail” just “obsessive fan stalking”, but I do like your site
when the links work

April 3rd, 2007 at 9:38 am
If you publish your home address I will be more than happy to send you fan mail
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:43 am
Cookies in my computer! Crumbs! I’m finding it all very hard to Digest-Ive been wondering if it was a good idea putting a Tracker on my site, I thought it would look good, i.e, seen to be Hob-nobbing it with all the other cool bloggers, I would have been crackers not to, so I thought. So Shitemeter are not Nice? Thanks for the info. I will pass this on to all the others on my Fig-roll.
April 3rd, 2007 at 10:01 am
AFC 30k - I’m thinking of letting you have 25% of my 50%, but there’s only a 20% chance of that.
Mr X - Oh it will be modest, trust me on that.
GH - Boooo. It is fixed now.
EP - Never.
Brom - Oh very dear. Even the taxi’s are refusing to pick you up now.
April 3rd, 2007 at 10:43 am
Wheres my cut?
And in the absence of site meter I strongly recommend google analytics, http://www.google.com/analytics.
Thats so good I can spend hours with different views, charts and statistics of my daily visitor.
April 3rd, 2007 at 10:44 am
Death to your spam filter. had to retype this!
Wheres my cut?
And in the absence of site meter I strongly recommend google analytics, www (dot) google (dot) com (forward Slash) analytics.
Thats so good I can spend hours with different views, charts and statistics of my daily visitor.
April 3rd, 2007 at 10:45 am
ok it wasnt your spam filter it was firefox not bothering to refresh your page. Death to firefox.
April 3rd, 2007 at 11:30 am
Goodness knows why the words “The real Mr. Angry” appeared at the end of my comment?
April 3rd, 2007 at 11:56 am
Oli - I have that now aswell…
brom - you use IE, correct? In Firefox it appears above my comments and was put there to counter a spate of fake Mr Angry’s commenting here…
April 3rd, 2007 at 12:25 pm
Think your ‘olive branch’ should start
‘Dear Shitemeter’
ET
April 3rd, 2007 at 12:27 pm
I have sitemeter on my blogs but I got bored using it, especially once Google Image Search got me catalogued and the results were worthless. Now I have a reason to remove them.
You are the Nicky Campbell of the cyberwaves. But angrier.
BTW, the Firefox thing works in Opera, too.
April 3rd, 2007 at 12:39 pm
i’ve switched to statcounter.com.
it’s much better than sitemeter eva was and it’s free and realtime
April 3rd, 2007 at 1:06 pm
If you don’t give your address out, what is the point of dropping hints about fan mail?
I want to by part of your fan Club
April 3rd, 2007 at 1:18 pm
Haha! Congratulations on serving the cunts right. Why don’t they just shove a camera up yer arse while they’re at it, eh?
Fuckin’ advertisers. Paid thousands to make a banner that consists of shooting ducks or questions so simple they wouldn’t be seen on Richard & Judy (e.g. “IS THIS LINDSAY LOHAN OR WHAT GEEZER?!”)
Perhaps I should do that with my new-fangled plan to hack into iPods and put sumbliminal satanist chants in between Lily Allen songs.
B.
April 3rd, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Thanks for that…bloody buggers…I have removed it too and will try the google thingymabob.
April 3rd, 2007 at 3:26 pm
sitemaster - cookie monster
can they see me when i’m hiding in the ladies toilets?
April 3rd, 2007 at 5:08 pm
I think Fat Jim is the best kept secret of the Internet.
April 3rd, 2007 at 5:52 pm
I’m fat but I’m not called Jim. Who is he? Inquiring minds want to know.
April 3rd, 2007 at 5:58 pm
I know where you live and I can see you. There is more bird shit on your car by the way and can you try to park just a little more considerately.
See you in the morning. Who need cookies.
April 3rd, 2007 at 7:59 pm
btw - where does one find a little Fat Jim on the Internet?
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:06 pm
[...] been interesting to read some of the fallout of SiteMeters recent change of policy regarding tracking cookies. If you hadn’t picked up on it, the previously popular free site stats program has started [...]
April 4th, 2007 at 8:44 am
I recommend statcounter.com - it’s free, you can have it with or without graphics on your page, and it gives you just as much info as sitemeter (well, as sitemeter did in the days I used it around 3 years ago). If even gives you a google map with flags on it representing where your visitors come from. It’s surprisingly accurate. Apparently, I have a reader in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, about four hundred miles off the west coast of Africa.
April 4th, 2007 at 9:27 am
GoStats.com was approached, but firmly said no to the cookie spam. If you are looking for a new web stats provider, you might want to give GoStats a look over.
April 5th, 2007 at 1:26 am
well, not lurking anymore since I can actually write something
Statcounter.com is something that I and my friends use. It has none of that cookie thingy, thanks goodness.
Anywhow, I hope your leg is better now?! And have a good Easter!
April 5th, 2007 at 8:34 am
[...] to my email of two days ago, I was delighted to note a response in my email inbox. Mainly as I was hoping this would be the [...]
April 5th, 2007 at 9:36 pm
Mr Angry —
Just wanted to let people know there is an alternative available — The first Open, Free and Collaborative Internet ratings service — Quantcast. (I work for there)
Many are familiar with our audience estimates – however we also allow publishers to get even more accurate data through direct measurement by signing up for the free “Quantified Publisher program”.
So far we have had tremendous response – publishers of all sizes have signed up and are loving the service — Publishers are delighted to be able to accurately represent their audience via a 3rd party source in front of potential advertisers, colleagues and investors.
The service is free and we put the publisher in control. If a publisher wants to hide various parts of their audience report they are free to do so, if they want to share all data they can as well.
Publisher control is of paramount impotance to us.
Mark Schulze